Revision History
Rev. |
Description of Modification |
Date |
A |
First Issue for Comments |
18/08/2022 |
B |
Revised according to IEC and SOR comment |
30/08/2022 |
6. Summary of Exceedance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Prosecitions............... 22
Appendix A Master Programme
Appendix B Overview of Desalination Plant in Tseung Kwan O
Appendix
C Summary
of
Implementation Status of
Environmental Mitigation
Appendix D Water Quality Graphical Presentation
Appendix E Site Inspection Proforma
Appendix F Waste Flow Table
Appendix G Summary
of
Exceedances
Appendix H Complaint Log
Appendix I Event/Action Plan for Noise and Water Quality Monitoring Exceedance
A1. The Project, Design, Build and Operate First Stage of Tseung Kwan O Desalination Plant (TKODP), is a Designated Project under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) (EIAO) and is currently governed by a Further Environmental Permit (EP No. FEP - 01/503/2015/A) for the construction and operation of the Contract.
A2. In accordance with the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual for the Contract, EM&A works for marine water quality, noise, waste management and ecology should be carried out by Environmental Team (ET), Acuity Sustainability Consulting Limited (ASCL), during the construction phase of the Contract.
A3. This is the 2nd Annual EM&A Review Report, prepared by ASCL, for the Contract summarizing the monitoring results and audit findings of the EM&A programme at and around Tseung Kwan O Area 137 (TKO 137) during the reporting period from 1 April 2021 to 30 April 2022.
A4. The EM&A programme for this contract has covered environmental monitoring on water quality, construction noise level at selected noise sensitive receivers, and Contractor’s environmental performance auditing in the aspects of construction dust, construction noise, water quality, waste management, landscape and visual and ecology.
A5. A summary of the environmental monitoring and audit works undertaken in the reporting period are summarized in Table I.
A6. No construction noise monitoring was conducted during the reporting period since there are no Contract -related construction activities undertaken within a radius of 300m from the monitoring locations. No Action Level exceedance was recorded during the reporting period.
A7. Water Quality Monitoring was conducted as schedule in the reporting period. Five hundred and thirty-seven (537) action level exceedances and three hundred and sixty-nine (369) limit level exceedances of Suspended Solid were recorded in the reporting period. Summary of exceedances could be referring to Appendix G.
A8. All Action and Limit Level exceedance was concluded to be unrelated to the Project. Details of the exceedance could be referring to Appendix O of the corresponding Monthly EM&A Report.
A9. Two hundred and fifty-two (252) times of landfill gas monitoring were conducted in the reporting period. No action and limit level exceedance was recorded in the reporting period.
Environmental Monitoring works |
Frequency |
Noise Monitoring |
N/A |
Water Quality Monitoring |
166 |
Landfill Gas Monitoring |
252 |
Environmental Site Inspection |
56 |
A10. No environmental complaint, notifications of summons and prosecution was received during the reporting period.
A11. There was no change to be reported that may affect the on-going EM&A programme.
The Jardine Engineering Corporation, Limited, China State Construction Engineering (Hong Kong) Limited and Acciona Agua, S.A. Trading as AJC Joint Venture (AJCJV) is contracted to carry out the Design, Build and Operate First Stage of Tseung Kwan O Desalination Plant (TKODP) under Contract No. 13/WSD/17 (the Contract).
Acuity Sustainability Consulting Limited (ASCL) is commissioned by AJCJV to undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services as required and/or implied, both explicitly and implicitly, in the Environmental Permit (EP), Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIA Report) (Register No. AEIAR-192/2015) and Environmental Monitoring and Audit Manual (EM&A Manual) for the Contract; and to carry out the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme in fulfillment of the EIA Report’s EM&A requirements and Contract No. 13/WSD/17 Specification requirements.
Pursuant to the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), the Director of Environmental Protection granted the Environmental Permit (No. EP-01/503/2015) and Variation of Environmental Permit (No. EP-01/503/2015/A) to Water Supplies Department (WSD); and granted the Further Environmental Permit (No. FEP- 01/503/2015/A) to AJCJV for the Contract.
This is the 2nd Annual EM&A Review Report for the Project which summarizes the key findings of the EM&A programme during the reporting period from 1 April 2021 to 30 April 2022.
The Contract Organization structure for Construction Phase is presented in Figure 1.1 and contact details of the key personnel are presented in Table 1.1 below:
Party |
Position |
Name |
Telephone no. |
Project Proponent (WSD) |
SE/CM2 |
Benny Lam |
2634-3573 |
Supervising Officer (Binnies Hong Kong Limited) |
Project Manager |
Christina Ko |
2608-7302 |
Chief Resident Engineer |
Roger Wu |
6343-1002 |
|
The Jardine Engineering Corporation, Limited, China State Construction Engineering (Hong Kong) Limited and Acciona Agua, S.A. Trading |
Project Manager |
Stephen Yeung |
2807-4665 |
Environmental Monitoring Manager |
Brian Kam |
9456-9541 |
|
Acuity Sustainability Consulting Limited |
Environmental Team Leader (ETL) |
Jacky Leung |
2698-6833 |
ANewR Consulting Limited |
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) |
Louis Kwan |
2618-2831 |
The construction programme is presented in Appendix A. Detail of the major construction activities undertaken could be referred to Section 1.4 in each monthly EM&A Report.
The status for all environmental aspects is presented in Table 1.2.
Parameters |
Status |
Water Quality |
|
Baseline Monitoring under EM&A Manual |
The baseline water quality monitoring was conducted between 12 May 2020 to 6 Jun 2020 |
Impact Monitoring |
On-going |
Noise |
|
Baseline Monitoring |
The baseline noise monitoring result has been reported in Baseline Monitoring Report and submitted to EPD under EP Condition 3.4. |
Impact Monitoring |
On-going |
Waste Management |
|
Mitigation Measures in Waste Management Plan |
On-going |
Environmental Audit |
|
Site Inspection covering Measures of Air Quality, Noise Impact, Water Quality, Waste, Ecological Quality, Fisheries, Landscape and Visual |
On-going |
Other than the EM&A work by ET, environmental briefings, trainings and regular environmental management meetings were conducted, in order to enhance environmental awareness and closely monitor the environmental performance of the contractors.
The EM&A programme has been implemented in accordance with the recommendations presented in the approved EIA Report and the EM&A Manual. A summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures for the construction phase of the Contract during the reporting period is provided in Appendix C.
To ensure no adverse noise impact, noise monitoring is recommended to be carried out within 300m radius from the nearby noise sensitive receivers (NSRs), during construction phase. The NSRs selected as monitoring station are (i) NSR4 - Creative Secondary School, (ii) NSR24 - PLK Laws Foundation College, and (iii) NSR31 - School of Continuing and Professional Studies - CUHK respectively.
The monitoring locations were normally made at a point 1m from the exterior of the NSRs building façade and be at a position 1.2m above the ground. A correction of +3dB(A) was made to the free-field measurements.
According to the environmental
findings detailed in
the EIA report and
Baseline Monitoring Report, the
designated locations for
the
construction noise monitoring
are
listed
in Table
2.1 below.
NSR ID |
Noise Sensitive Receivers |
Monitoring Location |
Position |
NSR 4 |
Creative Secondary School |
Roof Floor |
1 m from facade |
NSR 24 |
PLK Laws Foundation College |
Pedestrian Road on Ground Floor |
Free field |
NSR 31 |
School of Continuing and Professional Studies - CUHK |
Roof Floor |
1 m from facade |
Three noise monitoring locations for impact monitoring at the nearby sensitive receivers are shown in Figure 2.1-2.3.
|
Figure 2.1 NSR4 Creative Secondary School |
|
Figure 2.2 NSR24 PLK Laws Foundation College |
|
Figure 2.3 NSR31 School of Continuing and Professional Studies - CUHK |
Construction noise level were measured in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (LAeq). Leq 30min was used as the monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700 and 1900 on normal weekdays. Table 2.2 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency, and duration of the impact noise monitoring.
Time |
Duration |
Interval |
Parameters |
Daytime: 0700-1900 |
Day time: 0700-1900 (during normal weekdays) |
Continuously in Leq 5min/Leq 30min (Average of 6 consecutive Leq 5min) |
Leq 30min L10 30min & L90 30min |
The monitoring methodology and QA/QC procedure could be referring to Section 2.3 of the Monthly EM&A Report.
The Action/Limit Levels are in line with the criteria of Practice Note for Professional Persons (ProPECC PN 2/93) “Noise from Construction Activities - Non-statutory Controls” and Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process issued by HKSAR Environmental Protection Department [“EPD”] under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance, Cap 499, S.16 are presented in Table 2.3.
Time Period |
Action |
Limit (dB(A)) |
0700-1900 on normal weekdays |
When one documented complaint is received from any one of the noise sensitive receivers |
- 70 dB(A) for school and - 65 dB(A) during examination period |
Notes: Limits
specified
in
the
GW-TM
and
IND-TM
for
construction
and
operation
noise,
respectively.
If exceedances were found during noise monitoring, the actions in accordance with the Event and Action Plan shall be carried out according to Appendix E.
Referring to EM&A manual Section 4.1.2, the impact noise monitoring should be carried out when there are Contract-related construction activities undertaken within a radius of 300m from the monitoring stations. No monitoring station was located within a radius of 300m of the Contract site as shown in Figure 2.4, no impact monitoring for noise impact was conducted in the reporting period.
In accordance with the recommendations of the EIA, water quality EM&A is required during dredging for the submarine pipelines and, during operation phase. In addition, baseline water quality monitoring was prior to the commencement of marine construction activities.
The following Section provides details of the water quality monitoring to be undertaken by the Environmental Team (ET) to verify the distance of sediment and brine plume dispersion and to identify whether the potential exists for any indirect impacts to occur to ecological sensitive receivers.
Water quality monitoring for the Contract can be divided into the following stages:
- Dredging activities during construction phase;
- Discharge of effluent from main disinfection during construction phase;
- Operation phase - first year upon commissioning; and,
- Continuous monitoring of effluent quality.
In addition, the marine works contractor is required to complete a silt curtain efficiency test for the combined use of floating silt curtain type and cage type silt curtain for dredging at seawater intake to confirm the silt curtain reduction efficiency assumptions of the assessment. The details of testing plan together with the silt curtain deployment plan shall be submitted by the ET to seek approval from the IEC and EPD.
The parameters that have been selected for measurement in situ and in the laboratory are those that were either determined in the EIA to be those with the most potential to be affected by the construction works or are a standard check on water quality conditions. Parameters to be measured in the impact water quality monitoring are listed in Table 3.1.
Parameters |
Unit |
Abbreviation |
In-situ measurements |
||
Dissolved oxygen |
mg/L |
DO |
Temperature |
oC |
- |
pH |
- |
- |
Turbidity |
NTU |
- |
Salinity |
0/00 |
- |
Total Residual Chlorine NOTE1 |
mg/L |
TRC |
Parameters |
Unit |
Abbreviation |
Laboratory measurements |
||
Suspended Solids |
mg/L |
SS |
Iron-Soluble |
mg/L |
Fe |
Anti-scalant as Reactive Phosphorus |
mg/L |
PO4 as P- |
NOTE
1:
Monitoring
of
TRC
will
be
conducted
when
cleaning
and
sterilization
of
the
new
freshwater
main
is carried
out.
In addition to the water quality parameters, other relevant data was measured and recorded in Water Quality Monitoring Logs, including the location of the sampling stations, water depth, time, weather conditions, sea conditions, tidal stage, current direction and velocity, special phenomena and work activities undertaken around the monitoring and works area that may influence the monitoring results.
The monitoring methodology, monitoring equipment and QA/QC procedure could be referring to Section 3.1.2 - 3.1.4 of the Monthly EM&A Report.
The impact water quality monitoring locations are in accordance with the EM&A Manual and detailed in Table 3.3 below.
Station |
Easting |
Northing |
Description |
CE |
843550 |
815243 |
Upstream control station at ebb tide |
CF |
846843 |
810193 |
Upstream control station at flood tide |
WSR1 |
846864 |
812014 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Tung Lung Chau |
WSR2 |
847645 |
812993 |
Fisheries sensitive receiver at Tung Lung Chau |
WSR3 |
848023 |
813262 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Tung Lung Chau |
WSR4 |
847886 |
814154 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Tai Miu Wan |
WSR16 |
845039 |
815287 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Fat Tong Chau |
WSR33 |
847159 |
814488 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Tai Miu Wan |
WSR36 |
846878 |
814081 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Kwun Tsai |
Station |
Easting |
Northing |
Description |
WSR37 |
846655 |
813810 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Tit Cham Chau |
NF1 |
846542 |
813614 |
Edge of mixing zone, ~ 200m west of outfall diffuser |
NF2 |
846942 |
813614 |
Edge of mixing zone, ~ 200m east of outfall diffuser |
NF3 |
846742 |
813414 |
Edge of mixing zone, ~ 200m south of outfall diffuser |
WSR1 to WSR37 were identified in accordance with Annex 14 of the EIAO-TM as well as Clause 3.4.4.2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Study Brief for Desalination Plant at Tseung Kwan O (No. ESB-266/2013). WSR1 to WSR3 are sited near the Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone; WSR16 and WSR36 are sited near the coral assemblages along the coastlines of Fat Tong Chau and Kwun Tsai respectively; WSR 4 and WSR33 are sited near the Coastal Protection Area and coral assemblages in waters of Tai Miu Wan; WSR37 is sited near the fisheries resource including spawning and nursery grounds at the coastal water of Tit Cham Chau.
The Action and Limit Levels have been set based on the derivation criteria specified in the EM&A Manual. Based on the baseline water quality monitoring data and the derivation criteria, the Action/Limit Levels have been derived and are presented in Table 3.4.
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
Construction Phase Impact Monitoring |
||
DO in mg/L |
Surface and Middle 7.30 mg L-1 Bottom 7.31 mg L-1 Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone 5.1 mgL-1 or level at control station (whichever the lower) |
Surface and Middle 4 mg L-1 Bottom 2 mg L-1 Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone 5.0 mgL-1 or level at control station (whichever the lower) |
SS in mg/L (Depth- averaged) |
5.00 mg L-1 or 20% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
6.00 mg L-1 or 30% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
Turbidity in NTU (Depth-averaged) |
2.41 NTU or 20% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
2.84 NTU or 30% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
First-year Operation Phase Monitoring iv |
||
DO in mg/L |
Surface and Middle 7.30 mg L-1 Bottom 7.31 mg L-1 Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone 5.1 mgL-1 or level at control station (whichever the lower) |
Surface and Middle 4 mg L-1 Bottom 2 mg L-1 Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone 5.0 mgL-1 or level at control station (whichever the lower) |
SS in mg/L (Depth- averaged) |
5.00 mg L-1 or 20% exceedance of valueat any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
6.00 mg L-1 or 30% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
Turbidity in NTU (Depth-averaged) |
2.41 NTU or 20% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
2.84 NTU or 30% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
Salinity in PSU (Depth-averaged) |
34.28 PSU or 9% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
34.60 PSU or 10% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
Iron in mg/L (Depth-averaged) |
0.3 mgL-1 |
0.3 mgL-1 |
Notes:
i.
"Depth-averaged"
is
calculated
by
taking
the
arithmetic
means
of
reading
of
all
three
depths.
ii. For
DO,
non-compliance
of
the
water
quality
limits
occurs
when
monitoring
result
is
lower
than
the
limits.
iii. For Turbidity, SS, iron and Salinity, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring
result is higher than the limits.
iv. For the
Action and
Limit Levels adopted during First-year Operation Phase Monitoring, further review
would be made according to the EM&A Manual during Operation Phase.
The ET of the Contract had conducted the impact water quality monitoring between 1 April 2021 to 30 April 2022 at the ten designated monitoring stations and the six designated monitoring at waters near TKO in accordance with the EM&A Manual and Contract Specification respectively.
The impact water quality monitoring at the designated locations were conducted by the ET as scheduled in the reporting period. The graphical presentation of the water quality monitoring result was shown in Appendix D.
Five hundred and thirty-seven (537) of the general water quality monitoring results of SS obtained had exceeded the Action level. Three hundred and sixty-nine (369) of the general water quality monitoring results of SS obtained during the reporting period had exceeded the Limit Level.
Details of the exceedance could be referring to Appendix O of the Monthly EM&A Report.
The waste generated from this Project includes inert construction and demolition (C&D) materials, and non-inert C&D materials. Non-inert C&D materials are made up of general refuse, vegetative wastes and recyclable wastes such as plastics and paper/cardboard packaging waste. Steel materials generated from the project are also grouped into non-inert C&D materials as the materials were not disposed of with other inert C&D materials. Details of cumulative waste management data are presented as a waste flow table in Appendix F.
In according with Section 11 of the EM&A Manual, monitoring of landfill gas is required for construction works within the 250m Consultation Zone. Part of the desalination plant and the indicative area of natural slope mitigation works fall within the SENT Landfill Extension Consultation Zone; and part of the 1,200 mm diameter freshwater mains along Wan Po Road falls within the SENT Landfill and SENT Landfill Extension Consultation Zones, TKO Stage II/III Restored Landfill and TKO Stage I Restored Landfill Consultation Zones.
Since part of the desalination plant (Wan Po Road and MIC compound/Basketball Court) and the indicative area of natural slope mitigation works fall within the SENT Landfill Extension Consultation Zone in this contract (Figure 5.1), landfill gas monitoring would be required for Wan Po Road and MIC compound/Basketball Court (Figure 5.2) if excavations were conducted at more than 300mm deep. Although SENT Landfill Extension has commenced operation since November 2021, no excavation works were conducted at MIC compound/Basketball Court. Hence no landfill gas monitoring would be scheduled for MIC compound/Basketball Court at the current stage.
LFG monitoring was carried out to identify any migration between the landfill and the Contract and to ensure the safety of the construction, operation and maintenance personnel working on-site, visitors and any other person within the Contract area.
The following parameters were monitored:
- Methane
- Oxygen
- Carbon Dioxide
- Barometric Pressure
Landfill Gas monitoring was carried out using intrinsically safe, portable multi-gas monitoring instruments. Detail of monitoring equipment used in the reporting period could be referred to Section 5.10 of the corresponding Monthly EM&A Report.
Two hundred and fifty-two (252) times of landfill gas monitoring were conducted in the reporting period. No action and limit level exceedance was recorded in the reporting period.
Action and
Limit
Level
are
provided in Table 5.1.
Parameters |
Level |
Action |
Oxygen (O2) |
Action Level < 19% O2 |
Ventilate trench/void to restore |
|
Limit Level < 19% O2 |
O2 to > 19% Stop works |
|
|
Evacuate personnel/prohibit entry |
|
|
Increase ventilation to restore O2 to > |
|
|
19% |
Methane (CH4) |
Action Level >10% LEL |
Post "No Smoking" signs |
|
|
Prohibit hot |