CONTENTS
6. SUMMARY OF MONITORING EXCEEDANCE, COMPLAINTS, NOTIFICATION OF SUMMONS AND PROSECUTIONS.............................................................................................................................................................. 20
Appendix A Master Programme
Appendix B Overview of Desalination Plant in Tseung Kwan O
Appendix C Summary of Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation
Appendix D Water Quality Graphical Presentation
Appendix E Site Inspection Proforma
Appendix F Waste Flow Table
Appendix G Summary of Exceedances
Appendix H Complaint Log
Appendix I Event/Action Plan for Noise and Water Quality Monitoring Exceedance
A1. The Project, Design, Build and Operate First Stage of Tseung Kwan O Desalination Plant (TKODP), is a Designated Project under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) (EIAO) and is currently governed by a Further Environmental Permit (EP No. FEP - 01/503/2015/A) for the construction and operation of the Contract.
A2. In accordance with the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual for the Contract, EM&A works for marine water quality, noise, waste management and ecology should be carried out by Environmental Team (ET), Acuity Sustainability Consulting Limited (ASCL), during the construction phase of the Contract.
A3. This is the 1st Annual EM&A Review Report, prepared by ASCL, for the Contract summarizing the monitoring results and audit findings of the EM&A programme at and around Tseung Kwan O Area 137 (TKO 137) during the reporting period from 16 March 2020 to 31 March 2021.
A4. The EM&A programme for this contract has covered environmental monitoring on water quality, construction noise level at selected NSRs, and Contractor¡¦s environmental performance auditing in the aspects of construction dust, construction noise, water quality, waste management, landscape and visual and ecology.
A5. A summary of the environmental monitoring and audit works undertaken in the reporting period are summarized in Table I.
A6. No construction noise monitoring was conducted during the reporting period since there are no Contract -related construction activities undertaken within a radius of 300m from the monitoring locations.
A7. No water quality monitoring was conducted between March 2020 to February 2021, since the commencement of marine construction and dredging activities for the Project was scheduled in March 2021. All water quality monitoring was conducted as schedule during the reporting period.
A8. No landfill gas monitoring was conducted during the reporting period since SENT landfill Extension is still under construction, the landfill gas monitoring will be conducted after the commencement of operation of the SENT Landfill Extension.
Environmental Monitoring works |
Frequency |
Noise Monitoring |
N/A |
Water Quality Monitoring |
13 |
Landfill Gas Monitoring |
N/A |
Environmental Site Inspection |
55 |
A9. No construction noise monitoring was conducted during the reporting period. No Action Level exceedance was recorded during the reporting period.
A10. The EM&A works for water quality were conducted during the reporting period in accordance with the EM&A Manual.
A11. All water quality monitoring was conducted as schedule in the reporting period. Six (6) of the general water quality monitoring results of suspended solids (SS) obtained had exceeded the Action level. One (1) of the general water quality monitoring results of SS obtained during the reporting period had exceeded the Limit Level.
A12. All Action and Limit Level exceedance was concluded to be unrelated to the Project. Details of the exceedance could be referring to Appendix O of the represent Monthly EM&A Report.
A13. No landfill gas monitoring was conducted during the reporting period.
A14. No environmental complaint was received during the reporting period.
A15. Neither notifications of summons nor prosecution was received for the Contract.
A16. There was no change to be reported that may affect the on-going EM&A programme.
1.1. Background
The Jardine Engineering Corporation, Limited, China State Construction Engineering (Hong Kong) Limited and Acciona Agua, S.A. Trading as AJC Joint Venture (AJCJV) is contracted to carry out the Design, Build and Operate First Stage of Tseung Kwan O Desalination Plant (DPTKO) under Contract No. 13/WSD/17 (the Contract).
Acuity Sustainability Consulting Limited (ASCL) is commissioned by AJCJV to undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services as required and/or implied, both explicitly and implicitly, in the Environmental Permit (EP), Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIA Report) (Register No. AEIAR-192/2015) and Environmental Monitoring and Audit Manual (EM&A Manual) for the Contract; and to carry out the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme in fulfillment of the EIA Report¡¦s EM&A requirements and Contract No. 13/WSD/17 Specification requirements.
Pursuant to the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), the Director of Environmental Protection granted the Environmental Permit (No. EP-01/503/2015) and Variation of Environmental Permit (No. EP-01/503/2015/A) to Water Supplies Department (WSD); and granted the Further Environmental Permit (No. FEP-01/503/2015/A) to AJCJV for the Contract.
1.2. The Reporting
Scope
This is the 1st Annual EM&A Review Report for the Project which summarizes the key findings of the EM&A programme during the reporting period from 16 March 2020 to 31 March 2021.
1.3. Contract Organization
The Contract Organization structure for Construction Phase is presented in Figure 1.1 and contact details of the key personnel are presented in Table 1.1 below:
Party |
Position |
Name |
Telephone no. |
Project Proponent (WSD) |
SE/CM2 |
Benny Lam |
2634-3573 |
Supervising Officer (Binnies Hong Kong Limited) |
Project Manager |
Christina Ko |
2608-7302 |
Chief Resident Engineer |
Roger Wu |
6343-1002 |
|
The Jardine Engineering Corporation, Limited, China State Construction Engineering (Hong Kong) Limited and Acciona Agua, S.A. Trading |
Project Manager |
Stephen Yeung |
2807-4665 |
Environmental Monitoring Manager |
Brian Kam |
9456-9541 |
|
Acuity Sustainability Consulting Limited |
Environmental Team Leader (ETL) |
Jacky Leung |
2698-6833 |
ANewR Consulting Limited |
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) |
Louis Kwan |
2618-2831 |
1.4. Summary of Construction Works
The construction programme is presented in Appendix A. Detail of the major construction activities undertaken could be refer to Section 1.4 in each month EM&A Report.
The status for all environmental aspects is presented in Table 1.2.
Parameters |
Status |
Water Quality |
|
Baseline Monitoring under EM&A Manual |
The baseline water quality monitoring was conducted between 12 May 2020 to 6 Jun 2020 |
Impact Monitoring |
On-going |
Noise |
|
Baseline Monitoring |
The baseline noise monitoring result has been reported in Baseline Monitoring Report and submitted to EPD under EP Condition 3.4 |
Impact Monitoring |
On-going |
Waste Management |
|
Mitigation Measures in Waste Management Plan |
On-going |
Environmental Audit |
|
Site Inspection covering Measures of Air Quality, Noise Impact, Water Quality, Waste, Ecological Quality, Fisheries, Landscape and Visual |
On-going |
Other than the EM&A work by ET, environmental briefings, trainings and regular environmental management meetings were conducted, in order to enhance environmental awareness and closely monitor the environmental performance of the contractors.
The EM&A programme has been implemented in accordance with the recommendations presented in the approved EIA Report and the EM&A Manual. A summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures for the construction phase of the Contract during the reporting period is provided in Appendix C.
2.1. Monitoring Requirements
To ensure no adverse noise impact, noise monitoring is recommended to be carried out within 300m radius from the nearby noise sensitive receivers (NSRs), during construction phase. The NSRs selected as monitoring station are (i) NSR4 - Creative Secondary School, (ii) NSR24 - PLK Laws Foundation College, and (iii) NSR31 - School of Continuing and Professional Studies - CUHK respectively.
2.2. Monitoring Locations
The monitoring locations were normally made at a point 1m from the exterior of the NSRs building façade and be at a position 1.2m above the ground. A correction of +3dB(A) was made to the free- field measurements.
According to the environmental findings detailed in the EIA report and Baseline Monitoring Report, the designated locations for the construction noise monitoring are listed in Table 2.1 below.
NSR ID |
Noise Sensitive Receivers |
Monitoring Location |
Position |
NSR 4 |
Creative Secondary School |
Roof Floor |
1 m from facade |
NSR 24 |
PLK Laws
Foundation College |
Pedestrian Road on Ground
Floor |
Free-field |
NSR 31 |
School of
Continuing and Professional Studies - CUHK |
Roof Floor |
1 m from facade |
Three noise monitoring locations for impact monitoring at the nearby sensitive receivers are shown in Figure 2.1-2.3.
|
Figure 2.1 NSR4
Creative Secondary School |
|
Figure 2.2
NSR24 PLK Laws
Foundation College |
|
Figure 2.3 NSR31
School of Continuing and Professional Studies
- CUHK |
2.3. Monitoring Parameter, frequency and duration
Construction noise level were measured in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (LAeq). Leq 30min was used as the monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700 and 1900 on normal weekdays. Table 2.2 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of the impact noise monitoring.
Time |
Duration |
Interval |
Parameters |
Daytime: 0700-1900 |
Day time: 0700-1900 (during normal weekdays) |
Continuously in Leq 5min/Leq 30min (average of 6 consecutive Leq 5min) |
Leq 30min L10 30min & L90 30min |
2.4. Impact Monitoring Methodology
The monitoring methodology and QA/QC procedure could be referring to Section 2.3 of the Monthly EM&A Report.
2.5.
Action and Limit
Levels
The Action/Limit Levels are in line with the criteria of Practice Note for Professional Persons (ProPECC PN 2/93) ¡§Noise from Construction Activities - Non-statutory Controls¡¨ and Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process issued by HKSAR Environmental Protection Department [¡§EPD¡¨] under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance, Cap 499,
S.16 are presented in Table 2.3.
Time Period |
Action |
Limit (dB(A)) |
0700-1900 on normal weekdays |
When one documented complaint is received from any one of the noise sensitive receivers |
- 70 dB(A) for school and - 65 dB(A) during examination period |
Notes: Limits specified
in the GW-TM and IND-TM
for construction and operation noise, respectively.
If exceedances were found during noise monitoring, the actions in accordance with the Event and Action Plan shall be carried out according to Appendix E.
2.6.
Monitoring Results and Observations
Referring to EM&A manual Section 4.1.2, the impact noise monitoring should be carried out when there are Contract-related construction activities undertaken within a radius of 300m from the monitoring stations. No monitoring station was located within a radius of 300m of the Contract site as shown in Figure 2.4, no impact monitoring for noise impact was conducted in the reporting period.
In accordance with the recommendations of the EIA, water quality EM&A is required during dredging for the submarine pipelines and, during operation phase. In addition, baseline water quality monitoring was prior to the commencement of marine construction activities.
The following Section provides details of the water quality monitoring to be undertaken by the Environmental Team (ET) to verify the distance of sediment and brine plume dispersion and to identify whether the potential exists for any indirect impacts to occur to ecological sensitive receivers.
Water quality monitoring for the Contract can be divided into the following stages:
- Dredging activities during construction phase;
- Discharge of effluent from main disinfection during construction phase;
- Operation phase - first year upon commissioning; and,
- Continuous monitoring of effluent quality.
In addition, the marine works contractor is required to complete a silt curtain efficiency test for the combined use of floating silt curtain type and cage type silt curtain for dredging at seawater intake to confirm the silt curtain reduction efficiency assumptions of the assessment. The details of testing plan together with the silt curtain deployment plan shall be submitted by the ET to seek approval from the IEC and EPD.
3.1.
Water Quality Parameters
The parameters that have been selected for measurement in situ and in the laboratory are those that were either determined in the EIA to be those with the most potential to be affected by the construction works or are a standard check on water quality conditions. Parameters to be measured in the impact water quality monitoring are listed in Table 3.1.
Parameters |
Unit |
Abbreviation |
In-situ
measurements |
||
Dissolved oxygen |
mg/L |
DO |
Temperature |
oC |
- |
pH |
- |
- |
Turbidity |
NTU |
- |
Salinity |
0/00 |
- |
Total Residual Chlorine NOTE1 |
mg/L |
TRC |
Laboratory measurements |
||
Suspended Solids |
mg/L |
SS |
Iron-Soluble |
mg/L |
Fe |
Anti-scalant as Reactive Phosphorus |
mg/L |
PO4 as P- |
NOTE 1: Monitoring of TRC will be conducted when cleaning and sterilization of the new freshwater main is carried
out.
In addition to the water quality parameters, other relevant data was measured and recorded in Water Quality Monitoring Logs, including the location of the sampling stations, water depth, time, weather conditions, sea conditions, tidal stage, current direction and velocity, special phenomena and work activities undertaken around the monitoring and works area that may influence the monitoring results.
3.2. Monitoring Equipment
The monitoring methodology, monitoring equipment and QA/QC procedure could be referring to Section 3.1.2 - 3.1.4 of the Monthly EM&A Report.
3.3. Monitoring Location
The impact water quality monitoring locations are in accordance with the EM&A Manual and detailed in Table 3.3 below.
Station |
Easting |
Northing |
Description |
CE |
843550 |
815243 |
Upstream control station at ebb tide |
CF |
846843 |
810193 |
Upstream control station at flood tide |
WSR1 |
846864 |
812014 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Tung Lung Chau |
WSR2 |
847645 |
812993 |
Fisheries sensitive receiver at Tung Lung Chau |
WSR3 |
848023 |
813262 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Tung Lung Chau |
WSR4 |
847886 |
814154 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Tai Miu Wan |
WSR16 |
845039 |
815287 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Fat Tong Chau |
WSR33 |
847159 |
814488 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Tai Miu Wan |
WSR36 |
846878 |
814081 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Kwun Tsai |
WSR37 |
846655 |
813810 |
Ecological sensitive receiver at Tit Cham Chau |
NF1 |
846542 |
813614 |
Edge of mixing zone, ~ 200m west of outfall diffuser |
NF2 |
846942 |
813614 |
Edge of mixing zone, ~ 200m east of outfall diffuser |
NF3 |
846742 |
813414 |
Edge of mixing zone, ~ 200m south of outfall diffuser |
WSR1 to WSR37 were identified in accordance with Annex 14 of the EIAO-TM as well as Clause
3.4.4.2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Study Brief for Desalination Plant at Tseung Kwan O (No. ESB-266/2013). WSR1 to WSR3 are sited near the Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone; WSR16 and WSR36 are sited near the coral assemblages along the coastlines of Fat Tong Chau and Kwun Tsai respectively; WSR 4 and WSR33 are sited near the Coastal Protection Area and coral assemblages in waters of Tai Miu Wan; WSR37 is sited near the fisheries resource including spawning and nursery grounds at the coastal water of Tit Cham Chau.
3.4. Action and Limit levels
The Action and Limit Levels have been set based on the derivation criteria specified in the EM&A Manual. Based on the baseline water quality monitoring data and the derivation criteria, the Action/Limit Levels have been derived and are presented in Table 3.4.
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
|
Construction Phase Impact
Monitoring |
|||
DO in mg/L |
Surface and Middle |
Surface and Middle |
|
|
7.30 mg L-1 |
4 mg L-1 |
|
|
Bottom |
Bottom |
|
|
7.31 mg L-1 |
2 mg L-1 |
|
|
Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone |
Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone |
|
|
5.1 mgL-1 or level at control station |
5.0 mgL-1 or level at control station |
|
|
(whichever the lower) |
(whichever the lower) |
|
SS in |
mg/L |
5.00 mg L-1 or 20% exceedance of |
6.00 mg L-1 or 30% exceedance of |
(Depth- |
|
value at any impact station |
value at any impact station compared |
averaged) |
|
compared with corresponding data |
with corresponding data from |
|
|
from control station |
control station |
Turbidity in NTU |
2.41 NTU or 20% exceedance of |
2.84 NTU or 30% exceedance of |
|
(Depth- |
value at any impact station |
value at any impact station compared |
|
averaged) |
compared with corresponding data |
with corresponding data from |
|
|
from control station |
control station |
|
First-year Operation Phase
Monitoring iv |
|||
DO in mg/L |
Surface and Middle |
Surface and Middle |
|
|
7.30 mg L-1 |
4 mg L-1 |
|
|
Bottom |
Bottom |
|
|
7.31 mg L-1 |
2 mg L-1 |
|
|
Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone |
Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone |
|
|
5.1 mgL-1 or level at control station |
5.0 mgL-1 or level at control station |
|
|
(whichever the lower) |
(whichever the lower) |
SS in mg/L (Depth- averaged) |
5.00 mg L-1 or 20% exceedance of valueat any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
6.00 mg L-1 or 30% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
Turbidity in NTU (Depth- averaged) |
2.41 NTU or 20% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
2.84 NTU or 30% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
Salinity in PSU (Depth- averaged) |
34.28 PSU or 9% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
34.60 PSU or 10% exceedance of value at any impact station compared with corresponding data from control station |
Iron in mg/L (Depth- averaged) |
0.3 mgL-1 |
0.3 mgL-1 |
Notes:
i.
"Depth-averaged" is calculated by taking the arithmetic means of reading
of all three depths.
ii. For DO, non-compliance of the water
quality limits occurs when monitoring result is lower than the limits.
iii. For Turbidity, SS, iron and Salinity, non-compliance of the water quality limits
occurs when monitoring result is higher
than the limits.
iv. For the Action and Limit Levels adopted during
First-year Operation Phase Monitoring, further
review would be made according to the EM&A Manual during
Operation Phase.
3.5. Monitoring Programme
No marine water quality monitoring was conducted between March 2020 to February 2021. Marine construction works and dredging activities for the Project were commencement in March 2021 and April 2021 respectively.
The ET of the Contract had conducted the impact water quality monitoring between 1 March 2021 to 31 March 2021 at the ten designated monitoring stations and the six designated monitoring at waters near TKO in accordance with the EM&A Manual and Contract Specification respectively.
3.6. Monitoring results and observations
The impact water quality monitoring at the designated locations were conducted by the ET as scheduled in the reporting period. The graphical presentation of the water quality monitoring result was shown in Appendix D.
Six (6) of the general water quality monitoring results of SS obtained had exceeded the Action level. One (1) of the general water quality monitoring results of SS obtained during the reporting period had exceeded the Limit Level.
Details of the exceedance could be referring to Appendix O of the Monthly EM&A Report.
The waste generated from this Project includes inert construction and demolition (C&D) materials, and non-inert C&D materials. Non-inert C&D materials are made up of general refuse, vegetative wastes and recyclable wastes such as plastics and paper/cardboard packaging waste. Steel materials generated from the project are also grouped into non-inert C&D materials as the materials were not disposed of with other inert C&D materials. Details of cumulative waste management data are presented as a waste flow table in Appendix F.
5.1. Monitoring Requirement
In according with Section 11 of the EM&A Manual, monitoring of landfill gas is required for construction works within the 250m Consultation Zone. Part of the desalination plant and the indicative area of natural slope mitigation works fall within the SENT Landfill Extension Consultation Zone; and part of the 1,200 mm diameter fresh water mains along Wan Po Road falls within the SENT Landfill and SENT Landfill Extension Consultation Zones, TKO Stage II/III Restored Landfill and TKO Stage I Restored Landfill Consultation Zones.
For the part of the desalination plant and the indicative area of natural slope mitigation works fall within the SENT Landfill Extension Consultation Zone in this contract, since the SENT Landfill Extension is still under construction, the Landfill gas monitoring will be conducted after the commencement of operation of the SENT Landfill Extension which will be 2021 Quarter 3 according to the latest construction programme shown in the monthly EM&A Report of SENT Landfill Extension. The Contractor¡¦s safety officer will keep review the necessity of landfill gas monitoring during the construction stage. No landfill gas monitoring was conducted in the reporting period.
The Environmental Complaint Handling Procedure is shown in below Figure 6.1:
No noise monitoring was conducted during the reporting period since there are no Contract- related construction activities undertaken within a radius of 300m from the monitoring locations.
No marine water quality monitoring was conducted between March 2020 to Feb 2021. Marine construction works and dredging activities for the Project were commencement in March and April 2021 respectively.
Six (6) of the general water quality monitoring results of SS obtained had exceeded the Action level. One (1) of the general water quality monitoring results of SS obtained during the reporting period had exceeded the Limit Level.
Details of the exceedance could be referring to Appendix O of the represent Monthly Report. No landfill gas monitoring was conducted during the reporting period.
No notification of summons and prosecution was received in the reporting period. Statistics on complaint
and regulatory compliance are summarized in Appendix
J.
Site inspections were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the implementation of proper environmental pollution control and mitigation measures under the Contract. In the reporting period, site inspections were carried out from March 2020 to March 2021.
Fifty-five site inspection were carried out in the reporting period.
Environmental deficiencies were observed during weekly site inspection. Key observations during the site inspections and during the reporting period could be referring to the represent Monthly Report.
According to the EIA Study Report,
Environmental Permit, contract
documents and EM&A
Manual, the mitigation measures detailed in the documents should be
implemented as much as practical during the reporting period. An updated
Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures (EMIS) is provided
in Appendix C.
This is the 1st Annual EM&A Review Report for the Project which summarizes the key findings of the EM&A programme during the reporting period from 16 March 2020 to 31 March 2021, in accordance with the EM&A Manual and the requirement under FEP-01/503/2015/A.
No noise monitoring was conducted in the reporting period due to the over distant monitoring station from the works location, in which construction activities were not undertaken within a radius of 300m from the monitoring locations.
The EM&A works for water quality were conducted during the reporting period in accordance with the EM&A Manual.
Six (6) of the general water quality monitoring results of SS obtained had exceeded the Action level. One (1) of the general water quality monitoring results of SS obtained during the reporting period had exceeded the Limit Level. All Action and Limit Level exceedances were unrelated to the project.
Details of the exceedance could be referring to Appendix O of the represent Monthly EM&A Report.
No landfill gas monitoring was conducted in the reporting period.
Weekly environmental site inspection was conducted during the reporting period. Minor deficiency was observed during site inspection. The environmental performance of the project was therefore considered satisfactory.
According to the environmental site inspections performed in the reporting month, the Contractor is reminded to pay attention on maintaining proper materials storage, site tidiness and dust suppression mitigation measures.
No environmental complaint was received in the reporting period.
No notification of summons or prosecution was received since commencement of the Contract.
The ET will keep track on the construction works to confirm compliance of environmental requirements and the proper implementation of all necessary mitigation measures.
Appendix A
Master Programme
Appendix B
Overview of Desalination Plant in Tseung Kwan O
Appendix C
Summary of Implementation Status of
Environmental Mitigation
EIA Reference |
Recommended Environmental Protection Measures/ Mitigation Measures |
Objectives of the recommended measures & main concerns to address |
Implementation Agent |
Implementation Stage |
Implementation status |
Relevant Legislation & Guidelines |
||
D |
C |
O |
||||||
Air Quality |
|
|||||||
S4.8.1 |
Impervious dust screen
or sheeting will be provided to enclose scaffolding from the ground
floor level of building for construction of superstructure of the
new buildings. |
Land site/ During Construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
Air Pollution Control (Construction
Dust) |
S4.8.1 |
Impervious sheet will
be provided for
skip hoist for material transport. |
Land site/ During Construction, particularly dry season |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
NA |
|
S4.8.1 |
The area where dusty
work takes place
should be sprayed with water
or a dust suppression chemical immediately prior to, during and
immediately after dusty activities
as far as practicable. |
Land site/ During Construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
|
S4.8.1 |
All dusty materials should
be sprayed with water or a dust suppression chemical immediately
prior to any loading,
unloading or transfer operation. |
Land site/ During Construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
|
S4.8.1 |
Dropping
heights for excavated materials should be controlled to a practical height to minimize the fugitive dust arising from
unloading. |
Land site/ During Construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
|
S4.8.1 |
During transportation by truck, materials should not be loaded to a
level higher than the side and tail
boards, and should be dampened or covered before transport. |
Land site/ During Construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
|
S4.8.1 |
Wheel washing device should be provided at the exits of the work
sites. Immediately before leaving a
construction site, every vehicle shall be washed
to remove any dusty material from its body and wheels as far as practicable. |
Land site/ During Construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
|
S4.8.1 |
Road sections between
vehicle-wash areas and vehicular entrance will be paved. |
Land site/ During Construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
|
S4.8.1 |
Hoarding of not less than 2.4m high from ground level will be provided along the length of the Project Site
boundary. |
Land site/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
ü |
ü |
|
N/A |
|
S4.8.1 |
Haul
roads will be kept clear of dusty materials and will be sprayed with water so as to maintain the entire road
surface wet at all times. |
Land site/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented, rectified after reminder |
|
EIA Reference |
Recommended Environmental Protection Measures/ Mitigation Measures |
Objectives of the recommended measures & main concerns
to address |
Implementation Agent |
Implementation Stage |
Implementation status |
Relevant Legislation & Guidelines |
||
D |
C |
O |
||||||
S4.8.1 |
Temporary stockpiles of dusty materials will be either
covered entirely by impervious sheets
or sprayed with water to maintain the entire surface
wet all the time. |
Land site/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented, rectified after reminder |
|
S4.8.1 |
Stockpiles of more than 20 bags of cement, dry pulverised fuel ash and dusty construction
materials will be covered entirely by impervious sheeting sheltered on top and 3-sides. |
Land site/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented, rectified after
observation and reminder |
|
S4.8.1 |
All exposed areas
will be kept
wet always to minimise dust emission. |
Land site/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
|
S4.8.1 |
Ultra-low-sulphur diesel (ULSD) will be used for all construction plant on- site,
as defined as diesel
fuel containing not more
than 0.005% sulphur by weight) as
stipulated in Environment, Transport and Works Bureau Technical Circular (ETWB-TC(W)) No 19/2005 on Environmental Management on Construction Sites. |
Land site/ During construction/ During Operation |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
ü |
Implemented |
Environment, Transport and Works Bureau Technical Circular (ETWB- TC(W)) No 19/2005 on Environmental Management on |
S4.8.1 |
The engine of the construction equipment during idling will be switched off. |
Land site/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
|
S4.8.1 |
Concrete batching plant will be required on site. control measures recommended in the Guidance Note on a Best Practicable
Means for Cement
Works (Concrete Batching Plant) (BPM 3/2 (93)) will be implemented. The control measures recommended in the Guidance Note on a Best Practicable Means for Cement
Works (Concrete Batching Plant) (BPM 3/2 (93)) will be implemented. |
Land site/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
N/A |
|
S4.8.1 |
Regular maintenance of
construction equipment deployed on-site will be conducted to prevent black smoke emission. |
Land site/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
|
S4.10 |
To ensure proper implementation of the recommended dust mitigation measures and good construction site
practices during the construction phase,
environmental site audits on weekly basis is recommended throughout the construction period. |
Land site/ During construction |
Contractor(s)/ ET &
IEC |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
|
Note: D - Design
stage C - Construction O - Operation
EIA Reference |
Recommended Environmental
Protection Measures/ Mitigation Measures |
Objectives of the recommended measures & main concerns to address |
Implementation Agent |
Implementatio n Stage |
Implementation status |
Relevant Legislation & Guidelines |
||
D |
C |
O |
||||||
Noise |
||||||||
S5.7 |
Only well-maintained plant will
be operated on-site
and plant will
be serviced regularly during
the construction phase. |
All area/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise from Construction Works |
S5.7 |
Silencers or mufflers on
construction equipment will be utilised and will be properly maintained during the
construction phase. |
Noise control/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
N/A |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise from Construction Works |
S5.7 |
Mobile plant, if any, will be sited
as far away
from NSRs as possible. |
Noise control/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
N/A |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise from Construction Works |
S5.7 |
Machines and plant (such as trucks) that may be in intermittent use will be shut down between work periods or will be throttled down
to a minimum. |
Noise control/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise from Construction
Works |
S5.7 |
Plants known to emit noise strongly in one
direction will, wherever possible, be orientated so that the noise is directed away from the nearby NSRs. |
Noise control/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
N/A |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise from Construction
Works |
S5.7 |
Material stockpiles and other structures will be effectively utilised, wherever
practicable, in screening noise from on-site construction activities. |
Noise control/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
N/A |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise
from Construction Works |
S5.7 |
Use of Quite
Powered Mechanical Equipment (QPME). |
Noise control/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise from Construction
Works |
S5.7 |
Movable noise barriers of 3m in height with skid footing should be
used and located within a few metres of stationary plant
and mobile plant
such that the line of sight to the NSR is blocked
by the barriers. The length of the barrier should be at least five times
greater than its height. The noise barrier
material should have a superficial surface density of at least 7 kg m-2 and have no o or gappeningss. |
Noise control/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
N/A |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise from Construction
Works, |
S5.7 |
The
noise insulating sheet should be deployed
such that there would be no opening or gaps on the joints. |
Noise control/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
N/A |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise
from Construction Works, |
S5.7 |
Construction activities (e.g.
excavation/shoring, reinstatement (asphalt), and pipe jacking) will be planned and carried out in sequence,
such that items of PME proposed for these activities will not be operated simultaneously. |
Noise control/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
ü |
ü |
|
Implemented |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise from Construction
Works |
EIA Reference |
Recommended Environmental
Protection Measures/ Mitigation Measures |
Objectives of the recommended measures & main concerns to address |
Implementation Agent |
Implementatio n Stage |
Implementation status |
Relevant Legislation & Guidelines |
||
D |
C |
O |
||||||
S5.7 |
PMEs will not be used at the works areas near educational institutions with residual impact (ie the
¡§influence area¡¨ within a radius of 40m) during school hours in order to reduce impact to the educational
institutions. |
Noise control
/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
N/A |
A Practical Guide for the Reduction of Noise from Construction Works |
S5.7 |
Noise enclosures or acoustic sheds
would be used to cover
stationary PME such as generators. Portable/Movable noise
enclosure made of material with
superficial surface density
of at least 7 kg m-2 may be used for screening the noise from operation of the saw/groover, concrete. |
Noise control/ Pre- construction/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
ü |
ü |
|
N/A |
|
S5.9 |
Sawcutting
pavement, breaking up of pavement, excavation /shoring, pipe laying, backfilling, reinstatement (concrete) and pipe jacking shall
be scheduled outside the
examination period. |
Noise control/
Pre- construction/ During
construction |
Contractor(s) |
ü |
ü |
|
N/A |
|
S5.9 |
In view the duration of noise exceedance at Creative Secondary
School, PLK Laws Foundation College, TKO Kei Tak Primary
School and School
of Continuing and
Professional Studies-CUHK is limited to 8 weeks, the construction work in the influence areas near the four schools
shall be scheduled during long school holidays (eg
summer holiday, Easter holiday or Christmas holiday, etc) as far as practicable. Scheduling the construction work for the four schools. |
Noise control/ Pre- construction/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
ü |
ü |
|
N/A |
|
S5.10 |
A noise
monitoring programme shall be implemented for the construction phase. |
Designated monitoring stations as defined in EM&A Manual/During construction phase |
ET |
|
ü |
|
N/A |
|
S5.10 |
The effectiveness of on-site control measures could also
be evaluated through the regular site audits. |
All facilities/ During construction |
Contractor(s)/ ET & IEC |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
- |
Note: D - Design
stage C - Construction O - Operation
EIA Reference |
Recommended Environmental
Protection Measures/ Mitigation Measures |
Objectives of the recommended measures & main concerns to address |
Implementation Agent |
Implementation Stage |
Implementation status |
Relevant Legislation & Guidelines |
||
D |
C |
O |
||||||
Water Quality |
||||||||
S6.9 |
Dredged marine sediment will be disposed of in a gazetted
marine disposal area in accordance
with marine dumping permit conditions of the
Dumping at Sea Ordinance (DASO). |
Marine Dredging/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
Dumping at Sea Ordinance (DASO) |
S6.9 |
Disposal vessels
will be fitted
with tight bottom
seals in order
to prevent leakage of material during transport. |
Marine Dredging/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
- |
S6.9 |
Barges will be filled to a level,
which ensures that material does not spill
over during transport to the disposal site and that
adequate freeboard is maintained
to ensure that the decks are not washed by
wave action. |
Marine Dredging/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
- |
S6.9 |
After dredging, any excess materials will be cleaned
from decks and exposed
fittings before the vessel is moved
from the dredging area. |
Marine Dredging/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
- |
S6.9 |
All
vessels should be well maintained and inspected before use to limit any potential discharges to the marine environment. |
Marine Dredging/ During construction |
Contractor(s) |
|
ü |
|
Implemented |
- |